New York, June 13, 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service upgraded Berry Petroleum Company's (Berry) Corporate Family Rating (CFR) and Probability of Default Rating (PDR) to Ba3 and upgraded its senior unsecured notes rating to B1. The outlook is stable. This action concludes Moody's review for upgrade, which commenced on April 2, 2012.
"The upgrade reflects Berry's high cash margins on production," commented Andrew Brooks, Moody's Vice President. "With oil comprising 73% of first quarter 2012 production, Berry is well placed to take advantage of high oil prices. Accumulated acreage in the Permian ensures that the company has substantial development potential for future oil production growth."
Issuer: Berry Petroleum Company
..Upgrades:
.... Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to Ba3 from B1
.....Probability of Default Rating, Upgraded to Ba3 from B1
.....Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Upgraded to B1 from B2
.....Multiple Seniority Shelf, Upgraded to (P)B1 from (P)B3
....Multiple Seniority Shelf, Upgraded to (P)B2 from (P)Caa1
....Multiple Seniority Shelf, Upgraded to (P)B3 from (P)Caa2
......Outlook Actions:
....Outlook, Changed To Stable From Rating Under Review
RATING RATIONALE
Berry's Ba3 Corporate Family Rating (CFR) reflects its growing production, its high quality asset base, the extent to which production is dominated by crude oil, which contributes to its strong cash margins, offset by its relatively high debt leverage and modest size. A series of asset acquisitions have increased debt leverage, but diversified Berry's reserve base, supported by its long-lived, positive cash-flowing legacy California crude oil production.
We expect Berry's oil production will increase to approximately 75% of its total production in 2012, up from 69% in 2011, a function of its continuing three-basin focus in California, the Permian and the Uinta Basin. Total production in 2012 is expected to average 38,000-39,000 Boe per day, up roughly 8% from 2011, driven by an approximate 20% increase in oil production. Berry has largely mitigated commodity price risk, hedging 70% of its expected 2012 oil production and 40% in 2013. While the company has not hedged its natural gas production, its gas-fired steam requirements for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in California effectively act as a natural hedge for the bulk of its natural gas production.
Berry's 47% Proved Undeveloped Reserves (PUDs) and 21 year Proved Reserve life afford the company substantial drilling upside, minimizing the need for further acquisitions to generate growth. Its Permian Basin acreage is comprised of 71% PUDs at December 31, 2011, where Berry has identified over 450 potential drilling locations and will run a five rig program in 2012.
The SGL-2 rating reflects good liquidity through mid-2013. At March 31, 2012 on a pro forma basis, the company had approximately $824 million of availability under its $1.2 billion ($1.4 billion borrowing base) secured revolving credit facility, which matures in May 2016. The pro forma adjustment is the result of Berry's repayment of $350 million of its senior and senior subordinated notes subsequent to quarter-end with the proceeds of March 2012's $600 million senior notes issue. Berry's funds from operations and revolver availability should sufficiently cover capital expenditures and working capital requirements through 2013. The revolving credit facility has one financial covenant - a minimum EBITDAX to interest of 2.75x. There is ample headroom under the covenant and we expect full compliance through 2013. Substantially all of Berry's assets are pledged as collateral for the secured revolving credit facility.
The stable outlook reflects growth in Berry's production approaching a sustained level of 45,000 Boe per day in 2013, and the assumption that the company will only moderately outspend cash flow in 2012. An upgrade would be considered if Berry appears able to de-lever to below $30,000 debt to average daily production, and grows production to levels approaching 60,000 Boe per day. A downgrade would be considered should Berry's production fail to grow as projected, resulting in relative debt leverage failing to drop below $40,000 per Boe of average daily production.
The B1 rating on the senior unsecured notes reflects both the overall probability of default of Berry, to which Moody's assigns a PDR of Ba3, and a loss given default of LGD5 (74%). Berry's senior unsecured notes are subordinate to its $1.2 billion ($1.4 billion borrowing base) secured revolving credit facility's potential priority claim to the company's assets. The size of the potential senior secured claims relative to Berry's outstanding senior unsecured notes results in the notes being rated one notch below the Ba3 CFR under Moody's Loss Given Default Methodology.
The principal methodologies used in rating Berry were the Independent Exploration and Production Industry methodology published in December 2011, and the Loss Given Default for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial Companies in the U.S., Canada and EMEA, published in June 2009. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies.
Berry is a mid-sized independent E&P company headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody's Investors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following : parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings, public information, confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Analytics information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.
Andrew Brooks Vice President - Senior Analyst Corporate Finance Group Moody'sInvestors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653Steven Wood MD - Corporate Finance Corporate Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653(C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."
Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.
This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.